Main Article Content


The purpose of this work is to understand the role of family dynamics and culture in the development of psychological ownership of family shareholders. A qualitative and exploratory approach was used based on the study of 14 cases of Colombian shareholders and 5 cases of Finnish shareholders. The results show that family dynamics create opportunities to a) align expectations of the family concerning the business; b) improve communication between family members; c) consolidate common values in the family; and d), promote identification with the company. These opportunities foster the intention that family shareholders have to exercise control over the company, invest more time in it and, therefore, obtain a better understanding of it, which promotes the development of psychological ownership. When the two contexts were compared, it was found that the level of collectivism and individualism in each culture permeates the opportunities generated by family dynamics. In this sense, similarities were found regarding the alignment of expectations, communication, and interaction between family members, and identification with the company. On the other hand, it was observed that the dynamics that promote identification with the company through parents’ messages and the handling of different opinions generate a favorable environment that encourages psychological ownership in the Colombian case, but not in the Finnish one.

María Piedad López Vergara, Universidad de La Sabana

Professor, General Management Department, INALDE Business School, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Political Scientist, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Doctor in Economics and Business Administration, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Isabel C. Botero Laverde, University of Louisville

Associate Professor and Director, Family Business Center, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA. Social communicator and journalist, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia, Doctor in Communication, Michigan State University, USA.

Diógenes Lagos Cortés, Universidad de La Sabana

Researcher, INALDE Business School, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Business administrator, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia, Doctor in Administrative Sciences, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina.

López Vergara, M. P. ., Botero Laverde, I. C., & Lagos Cortés, D. (2021). The role of family dynamics and culture in the psychological ownership of family shareholders in family businesses. Cuadernos De Administración, 36(68), 138–151.

Astrachan, J. H. (2010). Strategy in family business: Toward a multidimensional research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 6-14.

Astrachan, J. H., Klein, S. B., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem1. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45-58.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Barnett, T., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2006). Are we family and are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 837-854.

Bernhard, F., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2011). Ownership perceptions in family businesses: Psychological difficulties of the retiring owner-manager (pp. 189-216). In I. Stamm, P. Breitschmid, & M. Kohli (Eds.), Doing succession in Europe: Generational transfers in family businesses in comparative perspective. Zurich, Switzerland: Schulthess.

Bernhard, F., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2011). Psychological Ownership in Small Family-Owned Businesses: Leadership Style and Nonfamily-Employees’ Work Attitudes and Behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 345-384.

Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279.

Bika, Z., Rosa, P., & Karakas, F. (2019). Multilayered socialization processes in transgenerational family firms. Family Business Review, 32(3), 233-258.

Blanco-Mazagatos, V., de Quevedo-Puente, E., & Delgado-García, J. B. (2016). How agency conflict between family managers and family owners affects performance in wholly family-owned firms: A generational perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 167-177.

Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555-575.

Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.

Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., & Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103-1113.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

De Massis, A., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra‐family succession. Family Business Review, 21(2), 183-199.

De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15-29.

De Massis, A., Sharma, P., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2012). Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Distelberg, B., & Sorenson, R. L. (2009). Updating systems concepts in family businesses: A focus on values, resource flows, and adaptability. Family Business Review, 22(1), 65-81.

Eddleston, K. A., & Morgan, R. M. (2014). Trust, commitment and relationships in family business: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(3), 213-216.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.

Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (2003). Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 283-301.

Erez, M., & Earley, P. (1993). Culture, self-identity and work. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Gehman, J., Trevino, L. K., & Garud, R. (2013). Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 84-112.

Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.

Hammond, N. L., Pearson, A. W., & Holt, D. T. (2016). The quagmire of legacy in family firms: Definition and implications of family and family firm legacy orientations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(6), 1209-1231.

Hanson, S. K., Hessel, H. M., & Danes, S. M. (2019). Relational processes in family entrepreneurial culture and resilience across generations. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(3).

Henssen, B. (2012). “Mine’or’ours”? Perspectives on psychological ownership in family firms. (University of Jyväskylä). Retrieved from

Hofstede, G. (1994). The business of international business is culture. International Business Review, 3(1), 1-14.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. California, USA: Sage Publications.

Hofstede Insights Network. (2019). Compare countries. Retrieved from

Koiranen, M. (2002). Over 100 Years of Age But Still Entrepreneurially Active in Business: Exploring the Values and Family Characteristics of Old Finnish Family Firms. Family Business Review, 15(3), 175-187.

Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family–centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1263-1288.

Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Sablynski, C. J. (1999). Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 161-187.

Lee, K., Makri, M., & Scandura, T. (2019). The effect of psychological ownership on corporate entrepreneurship: Comparisons between family and nonfamily top management team members. Family Business Review, 32(1), 10-30.

Liu, F., Chow, I. H.-S., Zhang, J.-C., & Huang, M. (2019). Organizational innovation climate and individual innovative behavior: exploring the moderating effects of psychological ownership and psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 13(4), 771-789.

Lumpkin, G. T., Brigham, K. H., & Moss, T. W. (2010). Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3-4), 241-264.

Neubaum, D. O. (2018). Family business research: Roads travelled and the search for unworn paths. Family Business Review, 31(3), 259-270.

Rau, S. B., Werner, A., & Schell, S. (2019). Psychological ownership as a driving factor of innovation in older family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 100246.

Savolainen, S., & Kansikas, J. (2013). Non-family employees in small family business succession: The case of psychological ownership. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 9(1), 64-81.

Schepker, D. J., Kim, Y., Patel, P. C., Thatcher, S. M., & Campion, M. C. (2017). CEO succession, strategic change, and post-succession performance: A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 701-720.

Sharma, P., & Irving, P. G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 13-33.

Sieger, P., Bernhard, F., & Frey, U. (2011). Affective commitment and job satisfaction among non-family employees: Investigating the roles of justice perceptions and psychological ownership. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(2), 78-89.

Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20-24.

Strike, V. M., & Rerup, C. (2016). Mediated sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 880-905.

Tàpies, J., & Moya, M. (2012). Values and longevity in family business: evidence from a cross‐cultural analysis. Journal of Family Business Management, 2(2), 130-146.

Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.

Van Wyk, R., & Adonisi, M. (2012). Antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship. South African Journal of Business Management, 43(3), 65-78.

Ward, J. L. (1988). The special role of strategic planning for family businesses. Family Business Review, 1(2), 105-117.

Ward, J. L. (2006). El éxito en los negocios de familia. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Norma.

Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case stud y research: Design and methods (6th ed.). California, USA: Sage Publications.

Zellweger, T. M., & Dehlen, T. (2012). Value is in the eye of the owner: Affect infusion and socioemotional wealth among family firm owners. Family Business Review, 25(3), 280-297.

Zhu, H., Chen, C. C., Li, X., & Zhou, Y. (2013). From personal relationship to psychological ownership: The importance of manager–owner relationship closeness in family businesses. Management and Organization Review, 9(2), 295-318.

Zhu, H., Zhang, P., Han, X., & Huang, T. (2018). Family involvement in management in private businesses and the effect on professional managers’ psychological ownership. Nankai Business Review International, 9(2), 225-243.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Received 2020-05-22
Accepted 2021-02-02
Published 2021-02-13