Work productivity management in knowledge-intensive service companies: considerations and challenges
Main Article Content
The purpose of this research is to inquire about the different considerations and perspectives that arise regarding the concept of productivity in the knowledge work context, as well as the main challenges that emerge in knowledge workers’ productivity management. A group of managers and workers from organizations in the knowledge-intensive services sector was interviewed. We resorted to content analysis to process the information, taking borrowing elements extracted from the systematic literature review for coding purposes. The perspectives among the interviewees regarding the concept of productivity diverge, and these differences are connected to the type of company and the role of the interviewee: manager or worker. The challenges reported include time management, complexity, heterogeneity, intangibility and task multiplicity, as well as the challenge for managers to set guidelines to measure and monitor productivity without affecting worker welfare. It becomes necessary to approach the concept of productivity from a holistic perspective, and to implement alternative managerial practices that take into account the nature of the work done, worker satisfaction and the diverse perspectives of stakeholders.
Adriaenssen, D. J., Johannessen, D. A., & Johannessen, J. A. (2016). Knowledge management and performance: Developing a theoretical approach to knowledge workers’ productivity, and practical tools for managers. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(3), 667-676. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.14(3-3).2016.10
Anitsal, I., & Schumann, D. (2007). Toward a Conceptualization of Customer Productivity: The Customer’s Perspective on Transforming Customer Labor into Customer Outcomes Using Technology-Based Self-Service Options. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(4), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679150405
Antikainen, R., & Lönnqvist, A. (2006). Knowledge work productivity assessment. Institute of Industrial Management. Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Tecnhology. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228397441_Knowledge_work_productivity_assessment
Arsalan, M.R, Dahooei, J.H, & Shojai, A.Z. (2014). A value-based framework for the assessment of knowledge workers. VINE, 44(2), 295-318. https://doi.org/10.1108/VINE-05-2012-0017
Dahooie, J.H., Arsalan, M.R., & Shojai, A.Z. (2018). A valid and applicable measurement method for knowledge worker productivity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1764-1791. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2017-0176
Davenport, T. H. (2008). Improving Knowledge Worker Performance. From Strategy to Execution, 215-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71880-2_11
Díaz L. G. (2002). Estadística Multivariada: inferencia y métodos. Bogotá, Colombia: Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2013). The productivity challenge in services: Measurement and strategic perspectives. Service Industries Journal, 33(3-4), 282-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2013.747519
Drucker, P. (1999). Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge. California Management Review, 41(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165987
Erne, R. (2011). What is Productivity in Knowledge Work? Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(10), 1367-1389. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f1ab/78a5d7aa68a7ade042735f5db7d8d3fab94d.pdf
Flick, U. (Ed.). (2014). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Washington, D.C., USA: SAGE Publications.
Grönroos, C., & Ojasalo, K. (2004). Service productivity - Towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 414-423. doi https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00275-8
Jääskeläinen, A., Laihonen, H., & Lönnqvist, A. (2014). Distinctive features of service performance measurement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 34(12), 1466-1486. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2013-0067
Laihonen, H., Jääskeläinen, A., Lönnqvist, A., & Ruostela, J. (2012). Measuring the productivity impacts of new ways of working. Journal of Facilities Management, 10(2), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961211218749
López, A., y Ramos, D. (2013). ¿Pueden los servicios intensivos en conocimiento ser un nuevo motor de crecimiento en América Latina? Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad -CTS, 24(8), 83-115. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=92429917006
Moussa, M., Bright, M., & Varua, M. (2017). Investigating Knowledge Workers’ Productivity Using Work Design Theory. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2016-0161
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3a ed.). London, England: Sage Publications.
Ramirez, Y. W., & Nembhard, D. A. (2004). Measuring knowledge worker productivity. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(4), 602-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410567040
Ramirez, Y. W., & Steudel, H. J. (2008). Measuring knowledge work: the knowledge work quantification framework. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 564-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810913168
Rannacher, A., Stranzenbach, R., Sturm, F., Mütze-niewöhner, S., y Schlick, C. (2013). A System Dynamics Model for the Evaluation of the Productivity of Knowledge-intensive Services. IBusiness, 5(3B), 55-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ib.2013.53B012
Ruostela, J., & Lönnqvist, A. (2013). Exploring More Productive Ways of Working. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 7(1), 153-161. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8d69/dcb496ec90842fae80c401db5efbe3439d8e.pdf
Rutkauskas, J., & Paulavicien, E. (2005). Concept of Productivity in Service Sector. Engineering Economics, 43(3), 29-34. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b3bf/be4e1f320398977b9fb6e9c1d903f8e9c551.pdf
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London, England: Sage Publications.
Spira, J., & Feintuch, J. (2005). The cost of not paying attention: how interruption impacts knowledge worker productivity. New York, USA: Basex, Inc. Retrieved from https://iorgforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/CostOfNotPayingAttention.BasexReport1.pdf
Tangen, S. (2005). Demystifying productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510571437
Similar Articles
- Gülizar Gülcan Şeremet, Zekai Öztürk, Mediator organizational justice in the relationship between power distance and organizational alienation , Cuadernos de Administración: Vol. 40 No. 78 (2024)
- Lorenzo Revuelto Taboada, Rafael Fernández Guerrero, New tools and new ideas for HR practitioners. Structural and predictive validity of weighted satisfaction questionnaire , Cuadernos de Administración: Vol. 28 No. 48 (2012)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Accepted 2020-02-10
Published 2020-01-15
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.